Thursday, February 21, 2008

Remote Starchoice Motorola Manual

The Bible ... literally?

When attacking the Bible and its contradictions, the clergy is defended by saying that the Bible should not be read literally. But you think about it, and if you have read at least a minimum of the Bible, comes to a convergence:
1. The Bible should not be read literally, has a deeper meaning which is related, therefore the facts recounted here are fictional and never happened.
2. The facts of the Bible are real and true, so it must be read literally.
Therefore, if we take the second path (ie, if read literally) are thousands of contradictions, we find thousands of lies and inconsistencies.
Now, if we decide to take the first path, the most advocated by the church, because we, therefore, that the story of the Bible is fictional, because the inconsistencies that have only one meaning can be assumed to be consistent if something never happened. So we'll have all the Bible is fictional, and its meaning is deeper and more personal, not really speaking of God and his exploits, his creation, his children, his church, etc.. In this case, is also fictional "creation" is the fictional story of Adam and Eve, the Flood, and so forth. Then we can also conclude that it is fictitious then the existence of god, therefore no God.
So what is the interpretation of the church to the Bible? Everything he says here is true, and if ever a contradiction, or says something incoherent, then it is something abstract?
then only parts of the Bible should be read literally? and how can one know which are to be read literally and which not?
In short, the argument used by the clergy is like all the other arguments used: say something but do not explain.
say the Bible should not be read literally, but they just say, do not say what the interpretation should have one to read the Bible. And we know well as a denial is the most primitive is to educate and that only promotes ignorance and repressive attitude towards oneself.
I leave this discussion without much inspiration today. I promise a more complete next time.
Sindia!

0 comments:

Post a Comment